SSO vs VOO
「SSO vs VOO」熱門搜尋資訊
「SSO vs VOO」文章包含有：「IsThatLeveragedETFWorthIt?ComparingSSOandVOO」、「SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析」、「SSOETF介紹：長期持有？複委託？兩倍做多標普」、「SSOvs.VOO—ETFcomparisontool」、「VOOvsSSO」、「VOOvsSSO」、「市場長期上漲，長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETFVOO」、「槓桿ETF長期持有？最佳槓桿比率」、「長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETFVOO、SSO為例：時間愈...」
查看更多
Is That Leveraged ETF Worth It? Comparing SSO and VOO
https://www.advisorperspective
SSO has had a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13 while VOO has had a Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. SOO has also had a lower Treynor Ratio than VOO (14.9 vs 16.69).
SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析
https://stockaball.com
而兩倍SPY的槓桿ETF像是SSO（0.89%/年）、SPUU（0.75%/年）. 多了差不多8-10倍的內扣費用. 1000萬的資產投資SPY，一年差不多扣9000元，而SSO扣了8 ...
SSO ETF介紹：長期持有？複委託？兩倍做多標普
https://finesttracker.com
SSO VS SPY 比較; 槓桿ETF 的特性; SSO ETF 管理費用; SSO 成分股持股 ... 的ETF，甚至是使用複委託來投資海外股票，如VT、VOO 等，我們都需要去「證券商」來開戶。
SSO vs. VOO — ETF comparison tool
https://portfolioslab.com
Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.72%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.63% annualized return. The ...
VOO vs SSO
https://www.askfinny.com
Both SSO and VOO are ETFs. SSO has a higher 5-year return than VOO (14.57% vs 11.43%). SSO has a higher expense ratio than VOO (0.89% vs 0.03%).
VOO vs SSO
https://www.reddit.com
I found VOO and invested very little so far but then someone close to me suggested SSO. SSO doesn't look good in long term as per its past ...
市場長期上漲，長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETF VOO
https://wealth.businessweekly.
槓桿ETF長期持有？最佳槓桿比率
https://vocus.cc
在過去十年長期持有原型為市值型的槓桿ETF，像是S&P 500指數兩倍槓桿的SSO、三倍槓桿的UPRO，都能輕鬆打敗指數和勝過一倍的原型ETF（VOO、SPY）。
長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETF VOO、SSO為例：時間愈 ...
https://today.line.me
理論來看，費用高長期投資不划算，既然2倍槓桿的SSO有這麼高的內扣費用，到底實際能不能比VOO獲得更好報酬呢？今天就來比較看看。